Menu
Log in


Login Icon 



Not So Common Law

ONLINE ZOOM MEETINGS

We are going to explore the historical and social background of some of the intriguing, interesting and important legal cases which have had lasting impact on our society and affect our lives today. Each month we will have a presentation about some of these famous and fascinating cases, plus the opportunity to discuss legal current affairs. Legal issues and law cases will be based on current events and participants' interests.

When: 4th Monday of the month 
Time: 1:00 - 3:00 PM
Dates:

2026:  June 29, September 28, October 26, November 23, no meeting in December         

2027: January 25, February 22, March 22, April 26, May 31, June 28

Where: Online Zoom meetings. Zoom link will be sent out to registrants via email.
Max:
100
Facilitator: Jim Conway, lawyer

JUDICIAL REVIEW - CHALLENGING GOVERNMENT DECISIONS

Democracy Watch applies for judicial review of a decision made by the Federal Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner. The Commissioner had ruled that former prime minister Justin Trudeau had not broken the law when he took part in a cabinet decision to award the WE Charity a $900 million contract to organize as summer work program for youth at the time of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Water Not Coal Citizen Initiative (Corb Lund) files an application for judicial review in the Alberta Court of King’s Bench, challenging the Chief Electoral Officer’s decision to deem the Water Not Coal Citizens’ Initiative Petition unsuccessful. The application argues that the decision was unreasonable, procedurally unfair, and inconsistent with the purpose of Alberta’s Citizen Initiative Act (CIA), which is intended to facilitate public participation in direct democracy.

A former School Trustee applies for judicial review of disciplinary decisions of the Red Deer School Board disqualifying her as a member of the Board. The proceedings arose from the applicant’s decision to post an image on her personal Facebook account which juxtaposed a historical image of children waving swastika flags with a contemporary image of children waving

rainbow pride flags. The caption on the post read “brainwashing is brainwashing.”

Alberta landowners apply for judicial review of the Alberta Energy Regulator’s decision setting the Orphan Well levy and chronic underfunding of that statutory levy. The applicant’s allege that the regulator has improperly delegated its legal responsibility to set the levy rates to Alberta's political executive and allows for too much industry influence. It further accuses the regulator of improperly taking into account factors like commodity prices and the health of the industry when setting the levy.

What is “judicial review”? What is its importance and what role does it play in the rule of law?

This program is facilitated and presented by Jim Conway, CALL member & retired lawyer.

To join the group, or to attend a session you are interested in, please register with the facilitator. Drop–ins are also welcome.

For registration information or to join the waitlist, visit: Registration

** You must be a member of CALL to register.  If you are not a member:  learn more about joining CALL

It is not necessary for you to register for this meeting or future meetings if you are on the emailing list for NSCL. Everyone who is on the email list receives an email notice of each meeting with the Zoom link.

Past Presentations

For general inquiries email: info

Contact Us


Please read this disclaimer to be advised of CALL's policy with respect to the endorsement of opinions, products or services associated with CALL programming.

Disclaimer

To SEARCH this site, enter keyword in the window below then press the enter key